Print to PDF
  • About Us
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us

Contact Lens Update

Clinical Insights Based in Current Research

Search Our Site

  • Home
  • Browse Past Issues
  • Resource Library
  • Back to Basics
  • Useful Links
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Feature Article

Face coverings and mask to minimise droplet dispersion and aerosolisation: a video case study

December 9th, 2020

Download PDF

Karen Walsh HeadshotKaren Walsh is the Professional Education Team Leader and Clinical Scientist at the Centre for Ocular Research & Education, (CORE) based at the University of Waterloo, Canada. She has previously worked as a Professional Affairs Manager in the contact lens industry, and in clinical practice in the UK. She holds a post graduate diploma in Clinical Optometry from City University, London UK, and is a Fellow of the International Association of Contact Lens Educators and the British Contact Lens Association.

Use of face masks is becoming more common around the world. This study sought to examine, via video visual representation, the efficacy of different mask designs in reducing expelled aerosols from the mouth and nose.

Face coverings and mask to minimise droplet dispersion and aerosolisation: a video case study
Prateek Bahl, Shovon Bhattacharjee, Charitha de Silva, Abrar Ahmad Chughtai, Con Doolan, C Raina MacIntyre. Thorax 2020;75:1024–1025.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215748

Using a healthy subject, four conditions were examined: no mask at all, a one-layer cotton fabric mask, a two-layer cotton fabric mask, and a three-ply surgical mask. With each condition, high speed video was used to capture light scattered by droplets and aerosols when speaking, coughing and sneezing.

Reproduced from “Face coverings and mask to minimise droplet dispersion and aerosolisation: a video case study”. Bahl P et al., Thorax 2020;75:1024–1025” with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

For speaking, a two-layer mask performed better than a single-layer cloth mask, which in turn was better than no covering at all. When coughing and sneezing, a double-layer cloth mask was significantly better at reducing the droplet spread compared to a single layer mask or nothing at all. In all conditions, the surgical mask was the best in preventing droplet spread from any respiratory emission.

Take home points: The videos demonstrate the value of using face masks in general, and of the difference in efficacy between different types of masks. There are additional factors that contribute to overall mask efficacy, including material type, the number and type of layers, the fit of the mask and how often it is washed. The videos show that for cloth masks, a design with at least two layers is preferable to a single-layer. Where available and necessary to use, surgical masks reduce droplet spread most efficiently out of the types tested in this study.

Related Articles

  • December 9, 2020

    A Year in Review: A Global Perspective on the Most Extraordinary of Years in Clinical Practice

  • December 9, 2020

    Face coverings and mask to minimise droplet dispersion and aerosolisation: a video case study

  • December 9, 2020

    Increase in Dry Eye Symptoms Among Middle and High School Students After Initiation of Online Learning Due to COVID-19 Pandemic

  • December 9, 2020

    Infographic: Mask Associated Dry Eye (MADE)

Issues

  • The role of biometry in myopia management
  • In-Office Procedures for Dry Eye
  • Multifocal Contact Lenses
  • Artificial Tears: An Update
  • Myopia: New Evidence and Best Practices
  • Neuropathic Pain
  • Specialty Rigid Lenses
  • Contact lens compliance
  • Pandemic update
  • Digital Devices and Dry Eye: A Growing Issue
  • The long and short of axial length
  • Using BCLA CLEAR with your patients
  • Helping your patients through allergy season
  • Getting the measure of meibomian glands
  • 2020: An extraordinary year
  • Scleral lens update
  • A dose of myopia
  • New news since TFOS DEWS II
  • COVID-19 Special Edition
  • Material considerations
  • Putting dry eye theory into practice
  • Getting started with Ortho-K
  • Infiltrates – an update
  • Staining
  • Myopia matters: Summarising the IMI reports
  • Lids and contact lenses
  • Myths
  • Revisiting patient compliance
  • Contact Lenses & Kids
  • Interprofessional Collaboration
  • Digital eye strain
  • New Dry Eye Technology
  • Update on Presbyopia
  • Taking stock of dry eye disease: DEWS II
  • Scleral Lenses
  • Pain and Sensation
  • Lab measurements in clinical practice
  • Control of pediatric myopia
  • Nutrition
  • Rethinking contact lens deposits
  • Extended wear
  • Daily Disposables
  • Eyelash Mites (Demodex)
  • Outsmarting bacteria with new technology
  • Youth and contact lenses
  • Sports Vision
  • Ocular effects of UV radiation from the sun
  • Eyelid Conditions
  • Makeup: Impact on ocular health
  • Myopia Control – Update 2014
  • The Growing Prevalence of Myopia
  • Cosmetic contact lenses
  • Contact lens discomfort – The essentials
  • Technology and contact lens research
  • It's A Question of Comfort
  • Contact lens materials
  • Let's talk about SICS
  • Conjunctival Controversies
  • Kids & Contact Lenses
  • One-day silicone hydrogel lenses
  • Solutions
  • Spotlight on Scleral lenses
  • Drug delivery via contact lenses
  • Ocular allergies
  • Reducing lens case contamination
  • Dry eye and meibomium gland dysfunction
  • Myopia Control
  • Presbyopia
  • Compliance and non-compliance
  • Lens care
  • Celebrating 50 years of contact lenses

Looking for another article?

Alcon coopervision Johnson&Johnson Vision Care

Newsletter Sign-Up

Sign-up for and start receiving our newsletter.

Site Map

  • Home
  • Browse Past Issues
    • Editorial
    • Feature Article
    • Clinical Insight
    • Conference Highlights
  • Resource Library
  • Back to Basics
  • Useful Links
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
© 2023 Contact Lens Update