Print to PDF
  • About Us
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us

Contact Lens Update

Clinical Insights Based in Current Research

Search Our Site

  • Home
  • Browse Past Issues
  • Resource Library
  • Back to Basics
  • Useful Links
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Feature Article

Midday fogging

October 28th, 2020

Download PDF

Dr. Melissa Barnett is a principal optometrist at the University of California, Davis Eye Center and is Past President of The Scleral Lens Education Society. Drs. Melissa Barnett and Lynette Johns authored and edited the book Contemporary Scleral Lenses: Theory and Application with the unique perspectives and contributions of international experts.

The challenge

A unique challenge of scleral lenses is fogging in the post-lens fluid reservoir, which is a frustrating problem for practitioners and patients alike. As explained in the editorial, when debris accumulates between the scleral lens and cornea, fogging may occur after minutes to hours of scleral lens wear.1 Post-lens tear reservoir debris (midday fogging) occurs when debris accumulates between the scleral lens and cornea, which may occur minutes to hours post lens insertion.2-9 Midday fogging requires frequent lens removal and reapplication, which is an inconvenience for many scleral lens wearers.

Recent work

A recent study investigated if midday fogging could be mitigated by a novel scleral lens filling solution, which closely approximates the ionic concentration and pH of human tears:10

Fogt JS, Karres M, Barr JT. Changes in Symptoms of Midday Fogging with a Novel Scleral Contact Lens Filling Solution [published online ahead of print, 2020 Sep 15]. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;10.1097/OPX.0000000000001559. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001559

This novel filling solution consisted of a formulation containing calcium, magnesium, potassium, and phosphate ions was compared to habitual sodium chloride solution. Current scleral lens wearers with prior complaints of midday fogging (N = 22) were evaluated and completed symptom surveys. The novel solution was assessed immediately and after 4 hours of lens wear via a slit lamp examination and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). After 5 to 9 days of using the novel solution, subjects were reexamined and the surveys repeated.

The median Ocular Surface Disease Index score decreased from 27.1 when using habitual filling solution to 9.1 when using the test solution (P = .006). The novel test solution (compared with the habitual solution) resulted in statistically significant decreases in burning/stinging (P = .04), grittiness/foreign body sensation (P = .01), dryness (P = .002), blurry/fluctuating vision (P = .002), and overall pain/discomfort (P = .006).

This study determined that the new solution was safe to use and was well tolerated. However, decreases in corneal staining and fogging were not statistically significant. Corneal staining is difficult to assess in a population with ocular surface diseases that are associated with inflammation, such as severe dry eye and keratoconus. A decrease in the mean staining score was found that was not statistically significant. This decrease suggests that products are at least equal to currently available substitutes. This improvement in staining may be due to the addition of calcium, magnesium, potassium, and phosphate ions to the typical sodium and chloride ions, mimicking the composition of human tears more than sodium chloride alone.

There were no statistically significant changes in fogging between the products for particulates viewed behind the lens with either slit-lamp biomicroscopy or OCT. However, there was a small average numerical decrease found with all methods of measuring fogging. It is possible that there are multiple origins of midday fogging, which may contribute to the particulates under the lens. In this study, lens fit was not altered and tear exchange was not evaluated.

Further studies of the effectiveness of this solution to reduce midday fogging with a larger sample size are indicated.

Take away points

The type of fogging must be established between front surface, post-lens fluid reservoir or corneal edema. Current management of reservoir fogging is lens removal and reapplication, fitting modifications (improving landing zone alignment or reducing reservoir thickness,4,11 using a more viscous fluid for lens application, and treating underlying ocular surface disease, including allergies and dry eye disease.12 Thus, multiple management strategies may need to be used to address fogging, as appropriate management of this problem will reduce the inconvenience of lens removal and reapplication and improve the scleral lens wearing experience.

REFERENCES:

  1. McKinney A, Miller W, Leach N, Polizzi C, van der Worp E, Bergmanson J. The Cause of Midday Visual Fogging in Scleral Gas Permeable Lens Wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013:ARVO E–Abstract 5483
  2. McKinney A, Miller W, Leach N, Polizzi C, van der Worp E, Bergmanson J. The Cause of Midday Visual Fogging in Scleral Gas Permeable Lens Wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013:ARVO E–Abstract 5483.
  3. Walker M. Scleral lenses, clearing the fog. ISITE Online J 2014; http://www.netherlens.com/october_2014  
  4. Postnikoff CK, Pucker AD, Laurent J, Huisingh C, McGwin G, Nichols JJ. Identification of leukocytes associated with midday fogging in the post-lens tear film of scleral contact lens wearers. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2019;60(1):226-233
  5. Walker MK. Laboratory Analysis of Scleral Lens Tear Reservoir Clouding. Global Specialty Lens Symposium, Las Vegas Jan 2014.
  6. Walker MK, Bergmanson JP, Miller WL, Marsack JD, Johnson LA. Complications and fitting challenges associated with scleral contact lenses: A review. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2016; 39(2):88-96
  7. Walker M, Morrison S, Caroline P, et al. Laboratory analysis of scleral lens tear reservoir clouding. Poster presented at the 2014 Global Specialty Lens Symposium, Las Vegas, Jan 2014.
  8. Carrasquillo, KG, Lipson MJ, Ezekiel DJ, et al. Chapter 12 Scleral Lens Complications and Problem Solving in Barnett M, Johns LK. Contemporary scleral lenses: theory and application. United Arab Emirates: Bentham Science Publishers, 2017:395-404.
  9. Schornack MM, Fogt J, Harthan J, et al. Factors associated with patient-reported midday fogging in established scleral lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 Mar 20. pii: S1367-0484(20)30048-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2020.03.005. [Epub ahead of print]
  10. Fogt JS, Karres M, Barr JT. Changes in Symptoms of Midday Fogging with a Novel Scleral Contact Lens Filling Solution. Optom Vis Sci. 2020; published online ahead of print: doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2020.03.005
  11. Skidmore K V., Walker MK, Marsack JD, Bergmanson JPG, Miller WL. A measure of tear inflow in habitual scleral lens wearers with and without midday fogging. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2019; 42(1):36-42
  12. Fadel D. Scleral Lens Issues and Complications Related to a Non-optimal Fitting Relationship between the Lens and Ocular Surface. Eye Contact Lens 2019;45:152–163

Related Articles

  • October 28, 2020

    Scleral Lens Update: Current and Future Applications

  • October 28, 2020

    Midday fogging

  • October 28, 2020

    Fiona Stapleton and colleagues explore the effect of adding a drop of artificial tear to the unpreserved saline filling solution of mini-scleral contact lenses

  • October 28, 2020

    Practitioner Reference: Disinfecting your Diagnostics

Issues

  • In-Office Procedures for Dry Eye
  • Multifocal Contact Lenses
  • Artificial Tears: An Update
  • Myopia: New Evidence and Best Practices
  • Neuropathic Pain
  • Specialty Rigid Lenses
  • Contact lens compliance
  • Pandemic update
  • Digital Devices and Dry Eye: A Growing Issue
  • The long and short of axial length
  • Using BCLA CLEAR with your patients
  • Helping your patients through allergy season
  • Getting the measure of meibomian glands
  • 2020: An extraordinary year
  • Scleral lens update
  • A dose of myopia
  • New news since TFOS DEWS II
  • COVID-19 Special Edition
  • Material considerations
  • Putting dry eye theory into practice
  • Getting started with Ortho-K
  • Infiltrates – an update
  • Staining
  • Myopia matters: Summarising the IMI reports
  • Lids and contact lenses
  • Myths
  • Revisiting patient compliance
  • Contact Lenses & Kids
  • Interprofessional Collaboration
  • Digital eye strain
  • New Dry Eye Technology
  • Update on Presbyopia
  • Taking stock of dry eye disease: DEWS II
  • Scleral Lenses
  • Pain and Sensation
  • Lab measurements in clinical practice
  • Control of pediatric myopia
  • Nutrition
  • Rethinking contact lens deposits
  • Extended wear
  • Daily Disposables
  • Eyelash Mites (Demodex)
  • Outsmarting bacteria with new technology
  • Youth and contact lenses
  • Sports Vision
  • Ocular effects of UV radiation from the sun
  • Eyelid Conditions
  • Makeup: Impact on ocular health
  • Myopia Control – Update 2014
  • The Growing Prevalence of Myopia
  • Cosmetic contact lenses
  • Contact lens discomfort – The essentials
  • Technology and contact lens research
  • It's A Question of Comfort
  • Contact lens materials
  • Let's talk about SICS
  • Conjunctival Controversies
  • Kids & Contact Lenses
  • One-day silicone hydrogel lenses
  • Solutions
  • Spotlight on Scleral lenses
  • Drug delivery via contact lenses
  • Ocular allergies
  • Reducing lens case contamination
  • Dry eye and meibomium gland dysfunction
  • Myopia Control
  • Presbyopia
  • Compliance and non-compliance
  • Lens care
  • Celebrating 50 years of contact lenses

Looking for another article?

Alcon coopervision Johnson&Johnson Vision Care

Newsletter Sign-Up

Sign-up for and start receiving our newsletter.

Site Map

  • Home
  • Browse Past Issues
    • Editorial
    • Feature Article
    • Clinical Insight
    • Conference Highlights
  • Resource Library
  • Back to Basics
  • Useful Links
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
© 2023 Contact Lens Update