• About Us
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us

Contact Lens Update

Clinical Insights Based in Current Research

Search Our Site

  • Home
  • Browse Past Issues
  • Resource Library
  • Back to Basics
  • Useful Links
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Conference Highlights

Understanding of Optometric Scope of Practice by First Year Osteopathic Medicine, Dental, and Pharmacy Students

June 28th, 2018
Eric Woo headshotEric A. Woo is an Assistant Professor and Interim Associate Dean of Academic Affairs at Midwestern University's College of Optometry.

Download the poster (.pdf), which was originally shared at American Academy of Optometry annual meeting, 2016.


Understanding of Optometric Scope of Practice by First Year Osteopathic Medicine, Dental, and Pharmacy Students
Eric A. Woo, Dena S. Weitzman, Naveen K. Yadav, Melissa A. Suckow

Purpose: Healthcare is moving toward an increase in interprofessional collaborative practice (ICP) as a goal of enhancing quality of care. Optometry should not be exempt. To our knowledge, there are no studies examining the understanding of optometric scope of practice by health professional students (HPS). The purpose of this study was to determine what various HPS currently understand about the scope of practice of optometry and their perceived confidence in that knowledge.

Methods: 443 students aged 20 to 45 (M=24.26, SD ± 3.35) years completed an optional paper survey. The survey was distributed in a single course given to first year osteopathic medicine, dental medicine, and pharmacy students in the winter quarter of 2015 at Midwestern University at Downers Grove, Illinois. Without external aids, HPS were given 5 minutes to answer questions including: “How well do you feel you have been informed of the different eye care providers and their scope of practice?” A 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from Very Weak to Very Strong was used. HPS also selected which functions a licensed optometrist within the United States could perform out of a list of 14 eye care related functions (10 were correct).

Results: First, the largest majority rated themselves ‘Moderately Weak’ (33.86%) and there was no statistically significant difference between programs (p>0.05). Second, responses to the 14 functions were scored. The average score amongst all HPS was 70.07%. A t-test revealed no significant (p > 0.05) difference between stronger versus weaker perceived levels of information.

Conclusion: HPS who believe they are more informed about eye care are scoring no higher than those that do not. Interestingly, amongst all HPS, confidence was low. These results may indicate there are opportunities to increase the confidence and knowledge of HPS on the scope of practice of optometry. This is beneficial in ensuring that with the growth of ICP, optometry will be included.

Related Articles

  • June 28, 2018

    Interprofessional Collaboration in Optometry: A Multidisciplinary Clinic in Toronto, Canada

  • June 28, 2018

    Evaluation of Interprofessional Education and Collaboration in Optometry

  • June 28, 2018

    Understanding of Optometric Scope of Practice by First Year Osteopathic Medicine, Dental, and Pharmacy Students

  • June 28, 2018

    Online Continuing Education: Enhancing Eye Care through Interprofessional Collaboration

Issues

  • Multifocal Contact Lenses
  • Artificial Tears: An Update
  • Myopia: New Evidence and Best Practices
  • Neuropathic Pain
  • Specialty Rigid Lenses
  • Contact lens compliance
  • Pandemic update
  • Digital Devices and Dry Eye: A Growing Issue
  • The long and short of axial length
  • Using BCLA CLEAR with your patients
  • Helping your patients through allergy season
  • Getting the measure of meibomian glands
  • 2020: An extraordinary year
  • Scleral lens update
  • A dose of myopia
  • New news since TFOS DEWS II
  • COVID-19 Special Edition
  • Material considerations
  • Putting dry eye theory into practice
  • Getting started with Ortho-K
  • Infiltrates – an update
  • Staining
  • Myopia matters: Summarising the IMI reports
  • Lids and contact lenses
  • Myths
  • Revisiting patient compliance
  • Contact Lenses & Kids
  • Interprofessional Collaboration
  • Digital eye strain
  • New Dry Eye Technology
  • Update on Presbyopia
  • Taking stock of dry eye disease: DEWS II
  • Scleral Lenses
  • Pain and Sensation
  • Lab measurements in clinical practice
  • Control of pediatric myopia
  • Nutrition
  • Rethinking contact lens deposits
  • Extended wear
  • Daily Disposables
  • Eyelash Mites (Demodex)
  • Outsmarting bacteria with new technology
  • Youth and contact lenses
  • Sports Vision
  • Ocular effects of UV radiation from the sun
  • Eyelid Conditions
  • Makeup: Impact on ocular health
  • Myopia Control – Update 2014
  • The Growing Prevalence of Myopia
  • Cosmetic contact lenses
  • Contact lens discomfort – The essentials
  • Technology and contact lens research
  • It's A Question of Comfort
  • Contact lens materials
  • Let's talk about SICS
  • Conjunctival Controversies
  • Kids & Contact Lenses
  • One-day silicone hydrogel lenses
  • Solutions
  • Spotlight on Scleral lenses
  • Drug delivery via contact lenses
  • Ocular allergies
  • Reducing lens case contamination
  • Dry eye and meibomium gland dysfunction
  • Myopia Control
  • Presbyopia
  • Compliance and non-compliance
  • Lens care
  • Celebrating 50 years of contact lenses

Looking for another article?

Alcon coopervision Johnson&Johnson Vision Care

Newsletter Sign-Up

Sign-up for and start receiving our newsletter.

Site Map

  • Home
  • Browse Past Issues
    • Editorial
    • Feature Article
    • Clinical Insight
    • Conference Highlights
  • Resource Library
  • Back to Basics
  • Useful Links
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
© 2023 Contact Lens Update